SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : TA-Quotes Plus
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ken Adams who wrote (4414)6/14/1998 9:09:00 PM
From: TechTrader42  Read Replies (2) of 11149
 
Ken: You wrote: "I run 2 drives. One is a small 350MB thing with most of my programs on it. The other is a 6.4gb that is partitioned into four drives. I put QP2 program on one of these partitions (nothing else there) and I put the data(Diskbuff)on another partition (also nothing else there)."

I may be wrong about this, but it's my understanding that you get the best performance if you put the program on one hard drive and the data (diskbuff) on another hard drive. You won't get the same result if you use two different partitions on the same hard drive. In other words, it would be best to put the QP2 program on the 350 MB drive (if there's room left) and the data on one of the partitions of the 6.4 gig drive. Performance does improve, but the scanning program is fast, and you'll still get good results if you leave the data and the program on the same hard drive.

Brooke
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News