SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp. - A Scam?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: scion who wrote (4448)3/9/2010 1:59:25 PM
From: scion  Read Replies (1) of 4624
 
Pacer update 03 Mar 10 CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:09-cr-00406-UNA USA v Harris et al

Date Filed # Docket Text

03/03/2010 90 RESPONSE in Opposition re 88 MOTION to Dismiss Counts on Grounds of Duplicity as to Benjamin Stanley filed by USA. (Anand, Justin) (Entered: 03/03/2010)

Defendant (1)Rufus Paul Harris

Defendant (2)Benjamin Stanley

Defendant (3)Darryl Horton

ecf.gand.uscourts.gov

Doc 90 Extract

GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT STANLEY’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS
FOR DUPLICITY (Doc. 88)

The United States of America, by and through its counsel,
Sally Quillian Yates, Acting United States Attorney, Northern
District of Georgia, and Justin S. Anand, Assistant United States
Attorney, hereby submits this Opposition to Defendant Stanley’s
Motion to Dismiss for Duplicity, as follows:

Subsequent to the pretrial conference, Defendant Stanley
moved to and was permitted to adopt Defendant Harris’s motion to
dismiss for duplicity (Doc. 69). The United States responded in
opposition to Defendant Harris’s motion to dismiss on February
23, 2010 (Doc. 87). The United States neglected to clarify that
this response was also in response to Defendant Stanley’s motion
(Doc. 88). Indeed, Defendant Stanley raises no arguments
separately from Defendant Harris’s motion. Thus, by definition,
Defendant Stanley’s motion fails for the same reasons as
Defendant Harris’s.

Therefore, pursuant to the Court’s scheduling order, the
United States submits this memorandum, which refers to and
incorporates the United States’s prior response (Doc. 87), in
opposition to Defendant Stanley’s adopted motion to dismiss.

Respectfully submitted,
SALLY QUILLIAN YATES
ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
/S/ Justin Anand
JUSTIN S. ANAND
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
600 U.S. Courthouse
75 Spring St., S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303
(404) 581-6322
(404) 581-6181 (Fax)
Georgia Bar No. 016116
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext