Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 322.51

+6.1%

Feb 6 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sam Citron who wrote (44603)	3/27/2001 1:27:30 PM
From: Fred Levine	Read Replies (4) of 70976

Sam-- I have a thing about our capacity to create categories. Does the Big Dipper exist or do we impose it on random stars? What constitutes the category of a breakout? Hell, we can't agree on the difference between life and death (when does life begin, when is someone dead), plant and animal (when I went to school bacteria were plants, now they're animals), and certainly something as arbitrary as a breakout being at 53 15/16 seems a bit arbitrary. If you are convinced that 53 29/64 is not a breakout, good luck to you and the techies. It does seem to be a masturbatory exercise to me. I'm sorry if I'm imposing hermeneutic reasoning to the thread. fred

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next