SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (4408)8/29/2004 11:04:58 PM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
The "Washington Times" shows just how serious this <font color=blue>"Combat
V"<font color=black> is. - From: LindyBill

<font size=4><font color=green>..."shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both."<font color=black>

'V' for valor or Kerry's version?
<font size=3>
Published August 29, 2004
<font size=4>
Of the many charges against John Kerry's Vietnam record made by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, the Kerry campaign has managed to keep Mr. Kerry's Silver Star story above water. Chicago Tribune editor William B. Rood came out last week as an eyewitness to the events of Feb. 28, 1969, bolstering Mr. Kerry's version of events, as have official Naval records.

Though Mr. Kerry has had to backtrack on at least two of his accounts -- the <font color=blue>"Christmas in Cambodia"<font color=black> story and whether he really deserved his first Purple Heart -- the day when Mr. Kerry beached his swift boat and tracked down a Viet Cong soldier seems to have withstood scrutiny.

Which is why we were surprised when we ran across some news accounts questioning Mr. Kerry's DD 214 ( a veteran's record of transfer or separation), which lists his Silver Star with a combat <font color=blue>"V"<font color=black> (for valor) and is posted at JohnKerry.com. According to military experts and historians, the combat <font color=blue>"V"<font color=black> is never awarded with a Silver Star. As Henry Mark and Erika Holzer note in Frontpagemag.com, <font color=green>"it would be redundant to award a Silver Star for 'gallantry' and then embellish it with a 'V' for valor."<font color=black> The authors also cite the Navy Awards Manual, which describes the laws concerning Combat Distinguishing Devices: Prior to 1974, <font color=green>"the 'V' was authorized for wear on the Legion of Merit, Bronze Star Medal, Joint Service Commendation Medal, Navy Commendation Medal and Navy Achievement Medal."<font color=black> Since then, about four more medals have been authorized. Conspicuously missing of course is the Silver Star.

On Friday, the Chicago Sun-Times ran a similar story by Thomas Lipscomb, who spoke to B.G. Burkett, author of <font color=purple>"Stolen Valor"<font color=black> and recipient of the Army's highest award given to a civilian, the Distinguished Civilian Service Award. For his book, Mr. Burkett had to read thousands of military records to uncover phony claims of awards. <font color=green>"I've run across several claims for Silver Stars with combat 'V's, but they were all in fake records,"<font color=black> he told Mr. Lipscomb.

Mr. and Mrs. Holzer bring up another interesting point. Over at JohnKerry.com, the Navy citation for Mr. Kerry's Silver Star does not mention the combat <font color=blue>"V"<font color=black>. It appears, then, that the Navy didn't mistakingly grant a <font color=blue>"V"<font color=black> with Mr. Kerry's Silver Star. So, how did it get into Mr. Kerry's DD 214?

This is more serious than one would think. In Title 19, U.S. Code, Section 1001, the law states: <font color=green>"Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the United States, knowingly and willfully ... makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both."<font color=black> As Mr. Lipscomb reports, a complaint filed by Mr. Burkett actually led to the sentencing of Navy Capt. Roger D. Edwards to 115 days in the brig for falsification of his records.

Mr. Kerry has yet another inconsistency to account for, and this one is by no means a question of foggy memories.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext