SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 180.88+2.0%Oct 31 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (45226)3/28/2005 1:05:33 PM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (1) of 196414
 
does Texas Instruments charge the 16% royalty for their GSM ASICs, or if not TI, who collects the GSM royalties? I thought TI was in the GSM Guild as an intellectual property contributor in the "all for one and one for all" deal. I suppose I should ask Google who collects 16% royalties and who pays that much.

I don't know who gave QUALCOMM the various GSM intellectual properties necessary for producing GSM ASICs, but I thought TI was one of the contributors and therefore I expect they are not paying royalties to the other GSM Guild members.


I agree that Qualcomm is not paying GSM royalties for their ASIC's. I dont think that anybody questions that.

The only question is if handset manufacturers who use a Qualcomm ASIC have pass-through rights for GSM IPR. That would mean a company like LG (not a GSM patent holder) could get away without paying royalties on the wholesale price of the handset to the GSM guild. This would amount to a HUGE savings for either a GSM only handset or a WCDMA/GSM handset. If Qualcomm really had this advantage, I would expect them to have 100% of the market among non-GSM patent holders.

Since this isnt the case, I reiterate that Qualcomm must only have limited pass-through rights for GSM IPR.

Slacker
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext