SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : North American Palladium(AMEX:PAL)- PGM Producer

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sleeper who wrote (454)2/15/2000 10:11:00 PM
From: Sleeper  Read Replies (1) of 976
 
I have been doing some research and "guesstamating" the 4Q report of NAP due out at the end of this month. The 3Q report was very revealing, and I will make some assumptions based upon it that may not be valid at the present time. In all cases, however, I have opted for the more conservative number in order to represent the more probable circumstances.

On November 25th, 1999 NAP issued it's 3Q results and stated, "The Company reported a net loss for the three months ended September 30, 1999 of $3,159,000 or $0.36 per share on revenue from metal sales of $11,961,000" and "The concentrator processed 254,564 tons during the third quarter of 1999 resulting in 15,602 ounces of palladium being shipped to the smelter"

During the 3Q, Pd prices ranged from a low of US $314/oz (05 July 1999) to a high of US$ 384/oz (29 Sept 1999) averaging approximately $350/oz.

During the soon to be reported 4Q, Pd prices ranged from US $374/oz (19 Oct 1999) to a high of US $ 415/oz (13 Nov 1999)averaging US $395/oz.

The Q over Q change in Pd prices represents an increase of US $45/oz, or a 12.8% increase in Pd prices alone. On 15,600 oz of Pd production, this represents additional revenues of approximately US $700,000, reducing the net loss to approximately US $2,460,000, or (-.22)/share.

Needless to say, the current Q (1Q 00)saw a spectacular rise in Pd prices, on the order of US $100/oz increase over average 4Q 1999 prices. Even if production remains the same, the net effect would reduce losses to approximately US $900,000.

Comments welcome.

Sleeper

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext