SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hogger who wrote (4556)4/13/2003 10:27:45 PM
From: dantecristo  Read Replies (1) of 12465
 
We wrote about this in our book "Be Careful Who You SLAPP" on pages 204-205:
"And so, in many ways defamation on Internet message boards is more accurately described as slander, the spoken word, rather than libel, the written word:

“... the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) renewed its stance that online critics and other speakers should be allowed to remain anonymous if they so choose.... “The Supreme Court has made it very clear that it believes anonymity (to be) a very fundamental First Amendment principle,” ACLU attorney Ann Beeson ... For the past few years, Beeson said, as the Internet has grown, the number “frivolous” defamation lawsuits aimed at exposing and, the ACLU believes, intimidating online speakers has grown tremendously. “We started following it as soon as it became a trend,” she said. To protect the anonymity of online speakers, the ACLU has asked the courts to impose a higher legal standard on plaintiffs seeking to sue online speakers for defamation, Beeson said. By requiring plaintiffs to prove that they have suffered “actual economic harm” from an alleged online attack, the courts could strike a good balance between the real needs of plaintiffs and the constitutional right of speakers to remain unnamed. To drive home that argument, the ACLU has argued that most online speech should be regulated under laws governing “slander” rather than those governing "libel.” ...”

According to the California Civil Code 46:

“Slander is a false and unprivileged publication, orally uttered, and also communications by radio or any mechanical or other means which:
1. Charges any person with crime, or with having been indicted, convicted, or punished for crime;
2. Imputes in him the present existence of an infectious, contagious, or loathsome disease;
3. Tends directly to injure him in respect to his office, profession, trade or business, either by imputing to him general disqualification in those respects which the office or other occupation peculiarly requires, or by imputing something with reference to his office, profession, trade, or business that has a natural tendency to lessen its profits;
4. Imputes to him impotence or a want of chastity; or
5. Which, by natural consequence, causes actual damage.”

It is important to understand how an Internet message board is different than a newspaper or magazine wherein defamation is treated as libel in California..."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext