Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Quickdraw who wrote (4575)	5/21/1997 3:39:00 PM
From: E. Charters	of 14627

Lots of questions.. 1. other areas drilled by BHP are small and have small ounces.. 2. overburden MAY contain .33 grams..do you want to heap leach 100 million tons of .01 gold? how long is this going to take.. seems like too little for too much..not proven feasible yet.. 3. the deposit is high silver sulfides..this is not provably heap leachable yet either.. 4. Diamond drilling MAY get higher grades..and they will have to do lots..not in yet..don't know the factors here..care to guess? It may not be that high.. 5. Established strike length of all mineral zones of good grade material does not exceed 1200 metres of possible ore. 6. If you want to play this stock long it would have to be on the long shot that they MAY find a 100% owned resource on the CB...exploration as we have often seen a la Corriente has no guarantees on it. There are stocks with better multiples more assured.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next