SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board
ZEN.V 0.930+4.5%11:06 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jayfish who wrote (4625)2/27/2016 4:59:48 PM
From: GrumpyGus of 12350
 
Absolutely no problems with your posts, Jayfish. In truth, I don't really mind it when people resort to name calling, as I think it indicates a lack of supporting information for their argument.

But I understand where you are coming from. Nothing has been proven, not by a long shot. But, walking the property (I have not, but an open invitation was extended a couple of times, and people took them up on it) has shown graphite exposures to be everywhere. In addition, they do not need to strictly follow the actual vein. The disseminated graphite has proven to be economical, and who knows how much that might add. This is not putting a number on it, but it indicates to those of us owning CCB that there is a very good chance that there will be enough. I know, you don't think that is what is indicated at all, so you don't own it. That's fine, you won't lose anything if it busts. Nor will you gain if it pans out. And the exact reverse is true for your owning ZEN, albeit the unknowns are different there.

So we disagree on the prospects of each project, but hope for the same end results. CCB's wait may be a lot shorter, good or bad, than ZEN's. Or maybe PDAC will tell the story for both. Who knows?

Good luck to us all.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext