Shedding light on the squeeze
Full story: online.wsj.com
WSJ Online reports: In the bond business, a standard indenture -- a detailed contract between an issuer and investors -- requires a company to file quarterly and annual reports with bondholders at or around the same time it files with the SEC. A company usually has 60 days to meet its missed filing deadline. Since a late filing is a technical default, so-called vulture investors, who typically buy bonds that trade at a discount to their face values, see a chance for a fast profit if a company can be forced to redeem at full value. The option-backdating probe, which has knocked down the bond prices of many of the companies being investigated, has provided a fresh opening for these investors.
Hedge funds, or private investment partnerships that cater to the wealthy investors, are fast becoming the dominant players in distressed-debt markets. But as they have proliferated, they are facing increasing pressure to generate outsized returns amid a sideways market.
With the number of delinquent filers on the rise, the trend could heat up. At least 25 companies during the past 18 months had their bonds accelerated in this way, or were forced to pay multimillion-dollar fees to bondholders, according to research by Merrill Lynch.
In a worst-case scenario for the companies being targeted, as part of the process for filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy-court protection, bondholders and other lenders could end up taking over ownership, says Dan Arbess, head of Xerion Partners, a hedge fund that invests in distressed assets.
Vitesse Semiconductor Corp., for example, is in such a precarious position, analysts say. The company, which makes networking and telecommunications equipment, has less than $30 million in cash. That is far less than the $96.7 million payment that on Aug. 21 bondholders demanded to be accelerated.
The Camarillo, Calif., Vitesse, whose shares have fallen to about 85 cents from more than $3 in March, lapsed into technical default after failing to file its financial statements on time. Once a high-flyer, with a share price of more than $100 in 2000, it's been fending off activist shareholders who want to put it up for sale. Now, analysts are concerned that the company is in jeopardy from bondholder demands.
"We believe Vitesse does not have the financial strength to make these payments," and it could suffer a serious cash crunch "if this dispute is not resolved," says Allan Mishan, an analyst at investment bank CIBC World Markets.
Chris Gardner, Vitesse's chief executive officer, was quoted in a prepared statement as saying that the bond investors' demands "have exceeded anything that we would consider reasonable under the circumstances." Vitesse, which is currently in negotiations with bondholders, didn't return calls for comment.
In order to avoid default, some delinquent issuers have offered concessions to bondholders in the form of extra fees or better terms on the bonds. These include retailer Saks, Connetics Corp. and Bausch & Lomb Inc., according to the companies themselves.
The concessions can be costly. In July, software maker Mercury Interactive, one of the first companies caught up in the options investigation, said in a July 3 regulatory filing that because it failed to file financial results, Mercury had to pay $7.1 million to creditors, and grant them an option to redeem their notes at a premium, to ward off default. It may have to pay as much as an extra $40.2 million if creditors exercise the option.
Other companies that have missed filing deadlines as a result of backdating issues have begun negotiating with their bondholders. On Aug. 21, Sanmina-SCI Corp. asked its bondholders for an extension, offering financial concessions of $12.5 million. On Aug. 11, Amkor Technology Inc. announced that trustees for a group of its bondholders warned that if the company didn't meet an upcoming filing deadline it would be considered in default of its bond indenture.
In January, a trustee representing BearingPoint bondholders filed a lawsuit against the consulting firm claiming that it was in default on two of its bond issues because it missed an SEC filing deadline due to accounting issues. BearingPoint disputed the claim and said in a statement: "This is a cynical attempt to extract leverage, and we intend to contest this every step of the way."
Jeff Ross of Anthony, Ostlund & Baer, the lawyer representing the trustee against BearingPoint, says bond funds have a legal obligation to their own investors to enforce their rights. "Someone lending hundreds of millions of dollars to companies is entitled to accurate financial information."
pcyhuang
huangcapital.com |
