Foreign Policy Discussion Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (4637)	2/26/2003 4:50:59 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) of 15987

Now who's getting excited?? :0) "Exasperated", rather.... I already said you are sometimes a very exasperating man :-) Sharon was found "indirectly responsible" because they claimed he did not move to prevent the massacrews No. Because he ALLOWED Phalangist militias to enter the refugee camps and watched as they went on a several day killing spree. I can show you plenty of instances where people are "indirectly responsible" for actions that others have taken How about we let the courts decide?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next