SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA)
CVIA 0.4800.0%Jun 30 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Matt Brown who wrote (4699)5/9/1998 11:13:00 AM
From: D LEE   of 6654
 
Hi Folks! Hi Matt! [Please, ALL SHAREHOLDERS THINK ABOUT THIS]

Matt's post last night was very interesting to me for 2 reasons.

1) He knows the CVIA shell has value.

2) He is thinking creatively about solutions that would
allow the shell to be used as it properly should;
for the benefit of the Shareholders.

Thinking ahead naturally solves possible problems "should they arise".
A problem is a problem only until you find a solution.
There are many solutions. You only need one. Choose the best.
I read one yesterday:

"Sell CVIA to a shell broker"


But I cannot contribute ideas to that solution. (my fault)

******************
However, I was able to send my thought to Matt, because he
"knows some", and can find other parts of the puzzle that I can't.
So I have offered him a possible key piece to the puzzle.
This is the way brain-storming begins. (imo)

The puzzle:
(Taking fair control of CVIA)
How can a group of shareholders create a very successful company,
and with the least amount of effort, out of a Public Shell
they all hold interest in? (that's you guys!)
Others, please follow his lead!

Keep in mind 2 things:

1) You all have one thing in common. You are Investors!
Specializing in one common goal.

2) You are all different (thank goodness) and each has extra
avenues/contacts that can provide help solving the puzzle.

Use the simplest harmonious ideas to fill the gap!

I expect there "could" be a "successful" merger, and this
may be construed as "insurance" or "premature thought"!
But after all, isn't that a good definition for thinking ahead!??
It is greatly beneficial and quite harmless to think about this!

In this confusion, my hat is off to you, Matt!
And I imagine this post will easily be lost in the confusion,
but should things go a certain way, your manner of thinking
will take center stage here.

If some people here reflect on this issue now
total creative solutions will be mentally in hand
should the need to use them arise.

Dave
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext