Since submittals during a strong run-up on the major avgs. may not be the best way to gauge performance, I went back a bit to find a more challenging week.
It is very interesting to note that the most recent down week on the Naz was preceded by this group of contributions to The Project:
To: +Alski (378 )
From: +Alski Sunday, Oct 10 1999 11:33PM ET
Reply # of 477
HELLOOOooo, anybody still play in this sand box?
Only one JQUV this week?
Screeming SMIplex and Rabbit on QDEL.
FWIW...Alski
___________________________________
To: +Alski (379 )
From: +bruce lamers Monday, Oct 11 1999 12:06AM ET
Reply # of 477
Alski;
I'm here yet, but it does look like the sand box is running out of sand. I'm going with LTXX for the "L's"
bruce
____________________________________
To: +Alski (379 )
From: +Rick Slemmer Monday, Oct 11 1999 12:14AM ET
Reply # of 477
Alski:
I'm here, too, but I can't find a B worth mentioning this week.
Call me B-fuddled.
RS
_______________________________________
To: +Alski (379 )
From: +Warthog Monday, Oct 11 1999 3:23AM ET
Reply # of 477
Alski:
I'm here, too, but I can't find a W worth mentioning this week.
Call me W-wuddled.
wart
__________________________________________
Since that weekend for the 10/8 close, when only 2 stocks were mentioned, QDEL has gone from 4 5/16 to 6 11/16 (and looks good for more here) and LTXX has gone from 13 7/8 to 20 15/16 (and also still looks good).
Another tidbit to consider: Only 47% of Nasdaq stocks are higher than they were a year ago and (yikes) only 36% of NYSE stocks are higher than they were a year ago.
FWIW,
Doug R |
