SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Spekulatius who wrote (47846)5/8/2012 3:52:00 PM
From: Sergio H6 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 78676
 
Maybe start at Winkipedia which has more correct information than your post.

en.wikipedia.org

BDCs are not for everyone but no one should read your post in determining if a BDC is right for them.

<Aren't BDC just crappy junk bonds with leverage in disguise. > No. Don't know of any BDCs that offer crappy bonds with leverage in disguise. Please show me one.

<They have nothing to do with private equity, although there are a few that take stakes in smaller companies as well.> Wrong. Most BDCs are involved in private equity in one way or another.

<Based on my observations, BDC are mostly a Ponzi scheme catering to investors reaching for yield a bit too far.> Please show one example of where a BDC is similar to a Ponzi scheme.

<in most cases, the yield is just a return on capital, either directly, or the loans are so risky that a default rate erodes the principal. > Not true. BDCs are governed by law on what they pay out to investors.

<These are not stocks you want to own if there are any problems in the credit market.> Why is the risk greater for a BDC if there are problems in the credit market?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext