"Less pregnant teenaged girls is unequivocally a good thing, period."
If a nineteen year old is able to make mature informed decisions and is ready, willing, and able to raise a child, I see no basis in which to agree with your statement.
I figured you to be a relativist to the extreme; where as, that comment was an absolute condemnation without adequate justification.
I can only conclude that partisan hackery is driving you to form an argument in desperation and in spite of clear, observable, obvious, and sensible information to the contrary.
"One of the reasons there is less of it now is liberalism has helped secure more equality, freedom and opportunity for women than they had in the 50's.
There are less traditional pregnancies where there is a family home to support the baby. The number of teenage pregancies where immature, children, who have no means of support, no preparation for raising a child, and no interest in being a parent has exploded from what was an insignificant number of girls in the fifties, when the number of children produced that way were easily accommodated through adoption to what we have today.
That too is unequivocally good.
Really? |
