SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: gamesmistress who wrote (48089)6/1/2004 11:21:54 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 793926
 
That's interesting Gina. I thought it was a softball interview, which is why I asked.

It looked to me like the interviewer raised points about current thinking where he knew the subject had different ideas to give him an opportunity to expound while adhering to the interview format.

He didn't really engage with Edelman on any of Edelman's replies to his questions, either, except to bring out another current problem.

I think this is the "tell." Had it been a hostile interview, one where the interviewer were challenging or disagreeing with the subject, the interviewer would have retorted or interrupted him a la Reilly.

I think the questions were setups and the interviewer served as the foil.

Funny the difference in perception.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News