I love it when you're wrong, Other Chap.
Your potholes only have to do with PRIOR Hayton problems.
Will you please explain, from your lofty perch (which I strongly suspect is situated somewhere behind the perpetrators of the anti-NETZ, pro-former-SIM-employee bad press), Steve Lair to me?
You have not, yourself, adequately addressed how the personal advisor to the chairman of a 6.5 billion dollar company (Acer Corp), and a former VP and Divisional Leader of Texas Instruments, can be in cohorts with, as you allege, scam artists. And you know as well as I do--who are you trying to fool?--that we are in the advent of internet video technology and it's massive explosion in common societal usage.
I'll explain, as best I can, what's happening now. And contrary to the fears you wish to instill, it ain't no SEC close down.
You folks who heap such fear are like kids throwing eggs at houses and automobiles. Indeed, you've got something in the bag as well. But that's beside the point.
Whether the vision of this company sprung from a good man or a bad man is not the question. Though many of you wish to make it this way. The fact remains that there really exists a very good man with a very good record and a very good reputation who will lead this company forward.
That man is Steve Lair. Why were people fired? Well, they weren't on Lair's team. I guarantee, if you're patient enough, you'll get your answer. Though this answer is not yet manifest, you'll hear it. And I suspect, in due time, you'll hear it from him. I refer you to the record of my prior postings which highlighted some of Lair's achievements with TI and Acer.
No CEO (if you can't see the writing in the stars on the CEO thing, forget it) of the magnitude of a Steve Lair is going to let the customer base, that NETZ components have developed, slip away. These will be firm for the future. Quite the contrary, you should be pleased that such a customer base even exists in the first place for a penny stock. Even you should know that something like this helps the going get going!
Now, consider also: Do you think Hayton's going to slip past the SEC and take all our money while, concurrently, Lair, Rogers, Burgess and the others of The New Team will only want to hang around and have their esteemed reputations and accomplishments of society be deemed into ruin? Are you saying these executives don't know what they're doing?
You think these men want to take your money away from you? Well, actually, when the NETZ commercials are up and running on our computers and we're bombarded with all sorts of advertising we don't want--at that point, I'll agree with you, they'll want to take our money, but we'll get a product in return because we will have chosen to purchase something.
If there's any "screwing" going on here, we're going to get it from folks like yourself, Other Chap. We know how you operate. You're even now--conveniently, I might add--in denial over video technology. If I were to choose a 'white knight' I'd pick Lair over Other Chap, et. al., any day of the week any week of the month and any month of any year.
Remember, nobody likes losing their job when they're on the advent of a breakthrough in technology that will have historic ramifications. Wired's got it in for NETZ and today we learned why. It's called "former employee disgruntlement," clear as night and day. That this, given all of the high-tech media connections, would spread and become nasty, is, well, both unfortunate and seemingly unavoidable.
I'm sorry, but in the ultimate analysis it is Lair, not Hayton. Sure, Wired, and now Stock Detective, have written negatively about Hayton. But there's also been descriptions of very unhappy former employees.
But, suddenly, I notice it is only you, Other Chap, who is commenting about the negativity of this technology (see your postings shortly before the release of Stock Detective), a new twist for you. I'm surprised that this comes from one who visits high-tech SI sites.
Yet none of the advertising journals, nor Wired nor Stock Detective wrote that NETZ's technology was bad. When Wired's friends were still on board, Wired liked the technology and the position of NETZ. Remember the first article where they described NETZ as a powerhouse from which to be reckoned?
I note also that none of these aforementioned media sources have yet come to grips with Lair's presence as CEO. But they will.
Forget about whose in for .20 or whose in for a buck. Think of the bigger picture. What is the driving idea behind this madness? Is it worth a risk? In my view, it is. Am I going to sell my shares so that somebody else can get 'em? No, I'm not. |
