The Bitter Pill
The End of Mac Clones and the Future of Apple
>If Rhapsody/Intel is licensed broadly, but only Apple sells Rhapsody/PPC systems, it gives Apple a distinctly superior user value, while not isolating them on an island. The OS will live in both worlds, but will run faster and better on Apple hardware. Applications written for Rhapsody will not only run on Apple boxes and Intel boxes running Rhapsody/Intel, but will also run on Windows95, WindowsNT, and MacOS 8 systems. This is better than being able to run multiple OS's on a single hardware platform -- it's being able to run applications on ANY hardware platform and ANY OS. And Apple will still have an advantage by having the fastest and coolest hardware around, whose sales will continue to subsidize the OS R&D.
Customer choice will be restored -- if you don't like Apple, buy an Intel clone. If you don't like Rhapsody, use Windows. You'll still be able to run your applications. This is compelling for users and developers. In fact, it's been shown in many cases that it's faster and easier to write a Windows application by writing to the OPENSTEP (Rhapsody) APIs, and then installing the OPENSTEP support layer on Windows, than writing it using conventional Windows development tools. Imagine that! With the arrival of Rhapsody, it will be easier to write a cross platform application than a Windows only application! And developers will be able to distribute the Rhapsody API support layer for Windows free of charge. <
pacificnet.net |