Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 180.90

+2.1%

Oct 31 9:30 AM EDT

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: slacker711 who wrote (48439)	11/4/2005 9:57:59 PM
From: Jim Mullens	of 196389

Engineer / Slacker, re: BRCM /NOK6 vs the Q and “, I think it is a fantasy to believe that Qualcomm can unilaterally raise the IPR rates on existing licenses.” <<<<<<<< “Unilaterally”, far from it---- at the decree of the EC in response to BRCM and the NOK6 with the support of the GSMA . ..... or, “ the Devil made us do it” Re: “whining fleet of 747's” Exactly, I rather doubt that this complaint will endear BRCM with the Korean and other Asian Handset manufactures currently partnering with the Q. Talk about “shooting oneself in the foot” !!!! Now who is BRCM going to peddle their goods too, NOK, EMP, NEC? Maybe Panasonic. WRT the above, did you catch Dr. Jacobs’ response to Modoff’s question if they had been speaking with the carriers yet with the reply>>>>> Not the carriers yet but with some of our handset partners.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next