SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: David Colvin who wrote (48268)4/24/2002 5:08:10 PM
From: LKO  Read Replies (1) of 64865
 

p.s. Can you tell that I like Quicken?


David, I have read with interest your enthusiastic Quicken
advocacy so I have some comments/questions/requests and
wishful thinking directed your way.

First a "technical" issue s and then some "political" ones.

- Does Quicken handle option transactions (puts, calls etc) ?

Now to get to the "political" ones.

Many years ago on an old Windoze98 box from HP that came
bundled with a basic version of Quicken and Microsoft Money.
I guess the game is to give you a basic version for free to
entice you to buy a paid version which is fine by me.

I tried Quicken. I entered the data and test drove it.
Then I decided to test drive the Microsoft Money and if
I remember correctly, voila, without asking me it
converted all the fine data files from quicken (.QIF?) to
its own format (.MYM?) and the pain of reentering data
prevenented me from ever thinking of becoming Quicken user
again.

With that background, I will now ask the loaded questions.

- Have you tried Microsoft Money ? I have heard that it
is able to understand Quicken data ;-) and you should be
able to compare the features. Will you please be a guinea
pig for us (after backing up your data files please) ?
Will appreciate any pros/cons of Quicken vs
Microsoft Money.

- With Microsoft Money as competition, and paid-for DOJ,
how long you think Quicken will last ? I have heard some
stories of people investing time in learning Lotus-1-2-3
and later having to learn Excel. :-p. No PC
application competition of Microsoft ever survives
with more than a single digit market share when this small
nuisance of anti-trust goes away and life returns to
"normal". So why should we bother with Quicken when
their is a pushed-by-Monopolysoft equivalent application
available ? BillG testified a few days ago how too many
choices for us customers are not good for us and he
knows best. Any comments ?

- Are you a Linux-type ? I have read good propaganda from the
Open-sores-software proponents at gnucash.org
how their software (which can read QUicken data files) is
better and does "double-entry-bookeeping" (whatever that
means) as opposed to Quicken that
does "single-entry-bookkeeping" only. Would appreciate
if someone with more clue could eveluate that. I know that
my 2GHz Win2K Pentium does not run my word
processor faster than my 0.5GHz Win98 Pentium and I afraid
this "double-entry-bookkeeping" etc may also not be
better than Quicken and I may be debugging someones
fix-it-yourself Linux application software. Will help
us if you could also evaluate that if possible now that
you have your data in Quicken format files.

Sorry for this long post full of unreasonable requests
from you, but then we have to push and see what we can
get away with. <G> Do what you can and let
us know whatever comments you have. Take care.

LKO
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext