SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (4829)9/13/2004 12:58:00 AM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
Question for the Mainstream Media

Wizbang
<font size=4>
CBS has said, on multiple occasions, that the <font color=blue>"documents were provided by unimpeachable sources."<font color=black>

Clearly these sources, to CBS at least, have a good reputation. It is therefor logical to conclude that these <font color=blue>"sources"<font color=black> have the ability to use the telephone.
<font color=green>
Then the question the other members of the media must start asking themselves, privately if not publicly, is why have their phones not rung?

Clearly this source wanted to get the documents into the media cycle.<font color=black> That being the case they can not be pleased the authenticity has been challenged. It would be in the best interest of this source to provide additional copies to other networks or indeed all the networks. CBS had its scoop on 60 Minutes II, giving them to the rest of the media would only be logical.

So for any of you in the mainstream media that might be reading this... Has your phone rung? Have any of your colleagues' phone rung?

What does that tell you about CBS's <font color=blue>"unimpeachable source."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext