SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board
ZEN.V 0.890-2.2%Dec 31 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GrumpyGus who wrote (5158)3/20/2016 6:12:24 PM
From: Luvin_ItRead Replies (1) of 12350
 
Gus, I tell you this because for the most part you attempt to be civil on here. Do yourself a favor and call any end user of high purity graphite. Ask them about their testing protocol and the time and money involved to have the existing process/product changed to a new one. In particular do some research on nuclear. They will spend 3-5yrs and millions of dollars before changing specs. So if you are to believe what you just said, CCB will not sell any graphite for at least 5 years to the nuclear industry.

Secondly, do you really believe a multi billion dollar industry is going to spend the time and effort necessary to test an admitted small potential supply of graphite like CCB might be able to produce? The cost/benefit analysis would kill the notion immediately.........this would be wasting their time. One of the first questions out of their mouth is "How much do you have" Call Dr. Chahar and ask him, he has sold to these industries for years.

Gus, you really need to think for yourself and do your own research, not listen to what others tell you. Could this graphite be sold to an end user, absolutely. Will it be sold to the nuclear industry, not a chance imo.

However, there are so many hurdles that need to be cleared before one can even contemplate regular sales to third parties.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext