re: You calling NTAP a "broken stock" a few months ago was a TA call with no context, no facts. You didn't mention TA then, either. Was it based on your dd or FA? I think not. That was ridiculous.
I gave my reason at the time. I have felt for long time that NTAP was overvalued. So my call was wrong, how many times must you bring it up? That has no barring to what I'm asking now. NONE! I'm trying to understand why NTAP will stay G forever like you believe they will be. I really do not want to go into how I feel or how you feel about the G perspective on how to invest. I'm more interested in the technology and how companies want to address the sector, and what it will mean to NTAP, that has been my whole point in this exchange. I'm not trying to force my investment techniques on anyone nor should you. I can read 10-k over and over but that's not the DS perspective or someone else's that might be reading this thread, on how NTAP could be knock off it's pedestal . If you feel NTAP management has covered all the negatives find, state so.
re: You're asking questions now, I believe, because you wish to argue ("make a point"). Not because you wish to learn or teach.
You obviously haven't read any of my past post elsewhere during my time on SI.
DS I will repeat it again. I'm interested in the technology. I find of value to look for the negatives in a company, much more then the positives. If I want to make post about short term direction TA or FA I will, and it's my right, but that's not what I'm trying to come to grips with here.
Now look what has happen we have degenerated already.
Greg->The Scarlet Letter hanging around his neck! My god he must be nuts to invest with using every available tool he can find. |
