Item 1.  Description of Business Business Development
           Development  Bancorp,  Ltd. (the  "Company")  Development  Bancorp is a holding  company  that owns  various  interests  in  subsidiaries  and  investee companies in the financial  services  industry in North America and Europe.  The Company was incorporated on August 16, 1984 in the state of Washington under the name Gold Valley,  Inc. for the primary purpose of exploring and developing gold properties.  No commercial  ore deposits were  developed.  In 1986,  the Company acquired an 18.75%  interest in an oil  partnership  consisting of five wells in Pondera County,  Montana. In 1991, the Company sold this partnership interest to the then officers and directors of the Company on an  installment  contract.  In 1991, the Company  canceled this contract from these  affiliates in exchange for investment  banking and financial  consulting  services when it became  apparent that  the  affiliates  were  not  willing  or  able to  pay.  After  sale of its partnership interest, the Company began to seek other business opportunities. On August 13, 1993, the Company changed its name to Development  Bancorp,  Ltd. and effected a 165-for-1  reverse stock split in preparation for a private placement fund raising. Under the Washington Business Corporation Act, the name change and the reverse stock split only required  approval of the Board of Directors of the Company and not approval of its  shareholders  In  conjunction  with the special meeting in lieu of the annual  meeting,  held on October 4, 1993,  the Company's shareholders  authorized the issuance of preferred stock, adopted a Stock Option Plan and ratified the reverse stock split.  Following this  reorganization,  the Company has directed its efforts towards financial  services as well as merchant banking  activities  focused on investing in financial service  subsidiaries and partnering with other companies around the world engaged in financial services.
  Financial Services
           In June 1993 the Company commenced its business of providing  financial services with the organization of an operating subsidiary, Societe Financiere de Distribution Geneve S.A. (oSFDo).  SFD operates in Geneva,  Switzerland and is a Swiss  financial  company.  In fiscal  1995 the  Company  organized  Development Bancorp  Services  Limited,  an  Irish  corporation??   ("Ireland").  SFD's  and Ireland's   activities  consist  primarily  of  financial  services,   including financial advisory and transactional  support services.  Neither Ireland nor SFD publicly  solicits  customer  deposits and both companies  employ other banks as custodian of customer cash and securities  assets, and are therefore exempt from the banking  regulations.  Both subsidiaries deal exclusively with institutional clients in Europe.  The Company's  European  operations  are managed by Riccardo Mortara,  president and chairman of the Company.  Mr.  Mortara has over 20 years experience  in the Swiss  banking  industry  and he is the owner and operator of Societe  Financiere  du Seujet,  a Swiss trust & portfolio  management  company. Certain conflicts of interest do exist (See Conflicts...)
           SFD is owned 99.3% by the Company and 0.7% by Mr. Riccardo  Mortara,  a managing  director  of SFD.  SFD was  capitalized  in  July,  1993 by a  capital contribution of 427,000 Swiss Francs ("SFr") by the Company and SFr 3,000 by Mr. Mortara.  If not for Mr. Mortara's  ownership of SFD, it would be a wholly owned subsidiary  of the Company and under Swiss law the Company would be deemed to be liable for all of SFD's  liabilities.  Societe  Financiere de Seujet,  S.A. is a shareholder of the Company,  and its shares may be deemed  beneficially owned by Mr. Mortara. Following the reorganization of the Company into financial services and the establishment of the Company's  European  subsidiaries,  the Company has been active in seeking merchant banking opportunities to invest and partner with other financial services companies around the world.
  Merchant Banking Activities
           In  September  of  1993,  the  Company  invested   US$921,000  with  an organization  known as PEMP.  PEMP is a licensed  Canadian  financial  advisory, insurance,  and fund management  group based in Montreal.  The Company  received 120,000 Class G Shares,  or 9%, of the holding company for the PEMP  operations, known as  Gestion  PEMP,  Inc.,  as well as a royalty  to  receive a portion  of certain fees from the  development  of the PEMP network.  The Class G shares are not transferable  except in the event of a sale of the entire business.  In 1996 and 1995 the
                                                           2
  Company  received $0 and $35,017,  respectively,  in commissions from royalty in the PEMP  Network.  No  proceeds  have been  received  in 1996  because  PEMP is currently  reorganizing  its ownership  structure and it is anticipated that the Company's  royalty right will be converted into redeemable  preferred  shares in late 1997. The PEMP group currently has 5 offices and 6,000 customers throughout Canada.
           In 1996, the Company helped fund PEMP's  expansion with the purchase of 4.65 million redeemable preferred shares of the senior holding Company,  Gestion Guychar Inc. for $3.5  million  (Canadian  dollars).  The  preferred  shares are non-voting, non-transferable, and non-participating and are redeemed as follows: $1,250,000 on October 1, 2001, with an annual cumulative dividend of 4%, payable on  October 1 of each  year;  $1,300,000  on  October  1,  2002,  with an annual cumulative  dividend of 3.8%,  payable on October 1 of each year; and $2,100,000 on  October 1,  2003,  with an annual  cumulative  dividend  of 3.5%  payable on October 1 of each year.  All  amounts  respecting  the  preferred  shares are in Canadian  dollars.  The purchase price of the preferred shares in US dollars was $3,132,012.
           On December 6, 1995, the Company acquired 1,967,1433 shares, or 51%, or KSM Financial  Holdings,  Inc. ("KSM") for a purchase price of $250,000.  KSM, a Nevada  corporation,  owns all of the capital stock of Global  Financial  Group, Inc. ("Global"). The management of KSM and Global continued without change after the  acquisition  by the Company.  Global is a broker deal  registered  with the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ("NASD"). Following the initial acquisition,  the Company  invested  additional  sums and negotiated  with Kevin Miller,  CEO of KSM and Global and the owner of the 49% remaining  stake in KSM, to acquire his stake.  With the Company's  assistance,  Global quickly grew from being an agency  brokerage  with offices in two US cities,  to a fully  licensed market maker and  underwriter,  with offices in ten US cities.  The terms of the acquisition  of the remaining  stake were  finalized in the early summer of 1996 and the  acquisition  was formally  closed on  September  6, 1996,  making KSM a wholly owned subsidiary. The additional stake was acquired from Kevin Miller for 110,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Shares of the Company.
           While the Company was pleased with Global's initial growth,  management of the  subsidiaries  were reluctant to fully implement  changes or improvements suggested by the Company,  and consistently failed to provide complete financial information  to the Company.  The Company  believed that the  acquisition of the remaining 49% stake, thus making KSM and Global wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company,  would make KSM and Global  management fully  answerable.  This did not prove to be the case.  Kevin  Miller  was  either  unwilling  or unable to fully embrace  and  implement  the  suggested  direction  and  changes  favored by the Company.  The Company favored revenue building strategies  including hiring more brokers for each  office.  The Company also  favored  strategies  to have Global enforce a basic dress code,  minimal work hours, and minimal  production levels. The company  favored  increased  compliance and a policy of restricting  brokers from  activities  that are not completely  understood and approved in advance by Global's head of compliance.
           Replacing  Kevin Miller was an option but it was also noted that he had substantial  loyalty among the Global workforce - who were  increasingly  seeing the  Company as an  unwanted  and  meddlesome  outsider.  At the same time,  the Company was having  difficulties  understanding the nature of Global's cash flow needs as well as troubles  completing the Company's  public  reporting - largely because of less than perfect cooperation from the subsidiaries.  On November 1, 1996, the Company  agreed to rescind the  acquisition of KSM and treat all  moneys  paid by the  Company  to or on behalf of KSM and  Global as a loan, due and payable in 3 years with 10% interest paid annually.  Kevin Miller signed the recission  agreement and wrote in two changes, a 5 year term and 8%  interest,  which only he  initialed.  In the summer of 1997  during routine audit  confirmations,  Kevin Miller informed the Company's  auditor that KSM and Global has no intention of ever repaying the Company. In part due to Mr. Miller's  comments  and in part for  fundamental  collectibility  concerns,  the auditor  has caused the  Company to write its  investment  into  Global  down to $250,000.  Because of Mr. Miller's current position and his failure to surrender the  Company's  Series B  Convertible  Preferred  Shares that he  received,  the Company is not certain of the legal  effect of the  recission or what the proper terms are.  The Company  intends to recover the maximum  amount  possible and is currently studying  litigation should a friendly  resolution not be forthcoming. Unless  otherwise  stated in this filing,  all  information  herein reflects the recission of the KSM/Global transaction.
                                                           3
           In the second  half of 1997,  the  Company  purchased  7,345  shares of Societe  Financiere Privee ("SFP"),  a Swiss bank for  US$4,148,293.  SFP offers complete banking and portfolio management services and is publicly traded on the Swiss Stock  Exchange.  The  Company's  ownership of SFP is equal to about 3% of SFP's  outstanding  shares.  The Company is currently in discussion  with SFP to co-develop and offer certain services in the United States.
  Competition
           Competition in the Company's areas of focus come from international and local banks,  brokerage firms, and other financial  institutions.  Most of these competitors  have greater  experience and greater  financial  resources than the Company.
  Employees
           The Company has 5 employees,  including its  officers.  The officers of the Company do not work  exclusively  for the Company and certain  conflicts  of interest exist (See conflicts).
  Regulations
           SFD is  subject  to  numerous  regulations  under the  Swiss  financial companies statutes.  SFD is subject to annual audit requirements;  must maintain an  adequate  relationship  between  its equity and its total  liabilities,  and between its current assets and  liabilities;  and is prohibited from engaging in money  laundering.  SFD is not  permitted to place  securities  with the general public, but only with institutional  clients,  and does not hold custody of cash for customers.  Commissions for securities  transactions are not regulated.  SFD opens  accounts  for each  customer in an  authorized  bank,  outside of its own balance sheet.
           Since SFD does not publicly  solicit  customer  deposits,  it is exempt from many reporting and  regulatory  provisions  ordinarily  applicable to Swiss financial companies.
           A financial  company like SFD which does not publicly  recommend itself for the  acceptance  of deposits  can obtain the status of a  bank-like  finance company  by  means  of a  decision  of  the  Banking  Commission.  Based  on the activities  of a  finance  company,  the  Banking  Commission  is  empowered  to interpret the applicability or  non-applicability  of certain  provisions of the Swiss Banking Law.
           In  addition  to  the  general  regulations  applicable  to  all  Swiss companies, bank-like companies, not publicly soliciting deposits, have to comply with the following provisions:
           (1)Pursuant  to Article 7 of the Swiss Banking Law they are required to submit to the National  Bank their annual  balance  sheet.  If the National Bank requires it may also require detailed semi-annual balance sheets, as well as any other  information  and  reports  which  it  may  consider  necessary,  such  in connection with the credit and monetary policy.
           (2)To enable the Banking  Commission  to determine  whether a bank-like finance company does not in fact publicly  solicit  deposits,  it is required to submit to the Banking  Commission an annual balance sheet prepared in accordance with the  Implementing  Ordinance to the Swiss  Banking Law, an annual report of the board of directors,  and an auditor's  report prepared by an independent and qualified auditing company.
           (3)Under  Article 8 of the Swiss Banking Law the prior  approval of the Swiss  National  Bank is  required  for foreign  bond or share  issues of SFr 10 million  or  more  floated  in   Switzerland   and  for  credits  and  loans  to non-residents in amounts exceeding this sum and with terms of longer than twelve months.  The rule applies to the  placement  of medium term foreign  obligations with a maturity of twelve  months or more,  if the amount  placed is expected to total Sfr 3 million  within a year.  The Swiss  National  Bank is  empowered  to refuse permission or to
                                                           4
  impose  conditions if deemed  necessary in the light of the Swiss franc exchange rate,  the  interest  rate trend on the Swiss money and  capital  markets or the overall national interest.
           In comparison  with banks,  the advantages of a finance company that is subject to Articles 7 and 8 of the Swiss Banking Law only consist,  for example, in the  fact  that  in the  exercise  of its  activity  it is not  bound  by the provisions  of  the  Swiss  Banking  Law  concerning   ratios  between   equity, liabilities and liquid funds. Moreover, such a finance company would be under no restriction if, for example,  it proposed to grant substantial credit facilities to a single  customer,  while real banks are  required  to  maintain an adequate ratio to their own funds with regard to any single borrower.
           There are no other licensing or other requirements known to the Company which would be required to enable it to compete effectively in the United States and foreign markets.
  I |