Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 172.98

+1.1%

Jan 2 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: foundation who wrote (5207)	12/4/2000 2:21:48 PM
From: mightylakers	Read Replies (1) of 197074

Tell you the truth Ben, I'm also confused as hell as well(ggg) Here are my speculations, and you know I'm not good at it. I think this is in fact the deal between Spinco/TI, not the QClassic/TI. When it is talking about ASIC for all standards, then we should all recall what's the reason for Spinco spinoff. If this TI deal means TI got royality free through x-license, then why we still need Spinco spinoff? Which means not only Q got nothing out of royality, they just add a formidable competitor to its chip business, does that make sense? To me this release would be very easy to understand if it didn't say covering both companies' patent portfolios. Which two companies? And then it says The companies have agreed to enter into a comparable agreement between TI and Spinco. I mean without the first part I would've already poped a Champion now. So what is it???

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next