<< "What I find interesting is that they say the bias has been there for many years. Yet in 2000, stories about Gore were far more likely to be negative than stories about Bush. The so-called liberal media must have just not liked Gore." >>
So you opine sans any credible evidence (again) & in the face of a study documenting it. And once again your opinion conflicts with reality.
You see, I paid close attention to the 200 election. I was stunned & appalled at the overt liberal media bias. My wife was so shocked & sickened by both the MSM & DNC after the election that she changed her registration from life long Democrat to Independent. I chose to begin documenting the relentless, overt leftist bias because it became obvious that libs seemed utterly blind to it.
Unfortunately, libs have also become so blindly partisan that many are still unable to see leftist MSM bias even when confronted with overwhelming evidence of its existence.
Here are but a few examples from the last couple of weeks (out of thousands documented on my thread over the years):
The media's plan for the rest of the election
Message 22946724
It's The Economy, Stupid MSM
IBD notes that 90% of the economic coverage in October
1992 were negative, but that decreased to 14% in
November ... after the election had concluded, and Bill
Clinton won.
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22940795
Economic Doom and Gloom
I think another study that Kevin Hassett.. tells the story
more clearly of why this economy is not getting the
respect it deserves. In that study, Hassett and John Lott
documented media bias in covering economic news depending
on whether there was a Republican or a Democratic
president in the White House. The results are quite
striking.
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22925918
New York Times Leaking Classified -- and Doctored? -- Information, Again
Message 22967458
The Washington Post, Caught in a Webb of Bias
Message 22951815
Lynne Cheney Was Right: CNN Special Spews Democratic Talking Points
Message 22967554
Oops, Never Mind!
[Calame's] characterization of the feelings that led him
astray in the first place are a striking admission of his
own biases.
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22936120
NYT's Calame: Oops. Our Bad
Message 22935802
Broken News Network
Message 22948239
The story behind the polls
Message 22958441
Kean More Than Holding His Own
As usual, though, the sample tells an interesting story.
The gap between Democrats and Republicans seems rather
wide in the sample. On page 15 of the analysis, we find
that the sample consisted of 22% Republicans, but 35% each
for Democrats and independents.
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22951384
Looking at the big picture, with all these bad, odd, and partisan polls
Message 22940209
Dems Like Dems!
Message 22936598
WHAT WOULD EDWARD R. MURROW HAVE THOUGHT?
Message 22936969
Day by Day
Message 22937094
Statistical politics update
Message 22929023
The Art of Headline Writing
Message 22946858
This is CNN
Message 22936175
Not an honest newspaper
Message 22936014
Deception in journalism
Message 22926582
Funniest Headline EVER!
Message 22935856
BBC Confesses To Being British
Message 22935763
The media quagmire
Message 22926606
Our enemy the BBC
Message 22936093
The BBC then and now
Message 22936134
The Unvarnished Truth
Message 22929976
Tet's Real Lesson
Message 22926649
Dershowitz Experiences The Clinton Double-Standard First-Hand
Message 22922974
NYTimes blabbermouths strike again
Message 22967569
Fair and.....What?
Message 22917887
Old Canards Never Die...
It's hard to know what to make of a news service that
persistently retails fables as facts, or of a reporter who
writes about President Bush "revising his explanation for
why the U.S. is in Iraq" without, apparently, having
bothered to read Congress's Authorization for the Use of
Military Force. But maybe it's not worth commenting on
what is in reality, like a lot of AP stories these days, a
campaign ad for the Democratic Party.
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22918003
