SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: lawndale1 who wrote (51930)12/2/2013 11:43:45 PM
From: Spekulatius  Read Replies (1) of 78684
 
RDI - i bought a few shares when it went down to almost 6$ a short while ago. It appears that the thesis is straightforward - the cinema operations is worth probably 80%+ of RDI's enterprise value, so you get real estate, generating 18M$ in rent gross income for almost free (at a 10x multiplier, this would be worth ~180M$). Even better, much of the real estate is underutilized or not generating any income at all. The pending sale of the Moonee property (basically undeveloped land) for 26M AUD or 2x book value validates that. Then there are the Manhattan properties worth 100M$+, more land Australia, movie theaters in Hawaii...

I think the NAV is twice the market cap, if this company were broken up, but of course it will trade at a discount as long as it's run by the family.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext