SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (53004)10/24/2008 8:39:42 PM
From: cirrus13 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 224655
 
Let me see... if Clinton's airstrikes had been more fortunate and managed to eliminate bin Laden, Saddam would not have aquired WMD and there would have been no need for Bush to invade Iraq.

But Clinton did not eliminate bin Laden, so Saddam aquired WMD - oh, wait... he never really did have them, but Bush invaded anyway... so it's Clinton's fault that Saddam didn't have WMD and Bush invaded without cause.

Uh oh... I'm starting to understand neocon thinking....

If Clinton had taken decisive action after numerous sailors were killed by alQaeda on the USS Cole, there would not have been a need for US troops to go to Iraq in the first place.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext