SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rosie'sPaw who wrote (5348)8/18/1998 8:31:00 PM
From: d:oug   of 11603
 
Clark, if you selected two persons that you feel have good commom sence,
that can be objective, and one has just obtained an education in an
engineering field like geology with a minor study in chemistry, and
the other just got a non-technical degree in something like time
management or something along the lines of "does this make sence"
or "what we have here is". Then both of these persons go to the
Maxam Web Site and write up a paper to submitt to a group of investors
looking to speculate into the precious metals market. I wonder what
conclusion or recommendation will be obtained by the investors reading
the two reports. Maby if this was actually done for real and the two
reports were posted here on this thread, then maby it could be a wake
up call for the Maxam Man who I get the impression controls this public
company as if its a private company owned by him. This may be a waste
of time if the Maxam Man simply views the shareholders as pests, not
as co-owners (shareholders like himself). Thru my reading of Richards
posts on this and the ipmcf thread, to me Richard is the type of man
every father having a daughter wishes would marry his precious one.
Also, if I needed someone to watch my back, armed or not, I would like
to have Richard there. I can go on and on, except that now that I layed
a bunch on good thoughts to Richard, I now swing 180 degrees and
suggest that Richard is being "used" by the Maxam Man, and Richard is
not aware of this and thinks himself too savy to be used. But, and its
only my option, Richard is not doing this calling the Maxam Man on the
telephone for us on this thread, he is doing it first for his own use,
and posts any on this chat thread as chat to be used as such. Reader
must decide its value and used or not by the reader based soly on the
readers conclusion of what it is by the reader, not by Richards view.
What I'am suggestion is simple and radical. Let the Maxam Man has one
of his engineers read this thread everyday, and if confusion or questions
are asked that need answers, then why should this thread bounce around
like a ping pong ball with the results being many answers, answers that
contridict other answers, and posts that give different explainations
to explain events. Ofcourse, thats why this SI exist, so a thread can
be used by persons to talk and discuss whats happening in the world
that can have a bearing on the stock. Great, but what if the most
importants facts needed are controlled by the Man. So my conclusion
is to discuss facts that can be verified, or more importantly, facts
given out by Maxam Company that the company can be held accountable in
a court of law. So if Richard stopped posting his info from the Man
what info would this thread have. Seems like only that on the official
Web page. Am I asking Richard to do something ? This question does not
exist under the contexts of my post since I have no right to "tell"
Richard what to do. All I'am doing is expressing my option. The only
way I can make Richard do something is either by force, like I point
a weapon at him, which is wrong. Or to present facts that this thread
can discuss, and Richard will join in, if he chooses.
My purpose is simple.
Mr Maxam Man tell us what is happening on the Web page. Right now I
can go there and be impressed by the layout and technical words and
be inclined to buy into the company. But, reading this thread is like
two different companies are being talked about, one is a good speculative
stock and the other is a possible scam. So if two independent write ups
of the web was done like I mentioned at the top of my post, maby Mr Maxam Man could see what really is out there for the shareholders and
public web shopping. This could all be a waste of time if Mr Man has
already taken the position to ignore us, even tho he will give out small
pieces of unofficial info thru friendly callers. And the info once again
is unofficial and the Maxam Company will not confirm or deny its thru
any official channels like web site or news release.
Richard, someday in the future I hope that when you visit your friends
in the Boston area, that all will good on these threads and you can
visit me at my home so I can open my gun safe to show you my collection.
Please don't take this as a personnel attack of me to you.
My motive is one and simple, mxam share value thru the Maxam Company
being successful.
Doug
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext