Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: combjelly who wrote (537826)	12/21/2009 12:29:50 PM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 1576035

>> You can quibble over the details because it isn't exact, but it isn't the only case where insurance is mandatory under certain circumstances. When you're talking about the law, surely you'll agree that details matter? Not only is it "not exact", but the entire concept is different. Nobody is FORCED to drive a car and thus nobody is FORCED to buy car insurance. Driving a car is a privilege that requires certain criteria to be met -- e.g., holding a drivers license. The difference is staggering and that you cannot even SEE the difference suggests there is a screw loose in your tiny little mind. You've got everyone projecting and casting straw men and having red herrings and yet you cannot even make a meaningful analogy on your own.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next