SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (53912)5/19/2014 5:10:51 PM
From: Paul Senior   of 78715
 
ESV: I still like it for a buy. Although I seem to be wrong: I liked it and bought it at an average cost of $54-55.

Barron's says today:

For some stocks, the big dips might not make them worth buying. Jefferies’ analyst Brad Handler and team explain why they downgraded Ensco today:Even after taking delivery of its floating rig newbuilds, Ensco will still be generating more than 1/3 of its revenues and EBITDA from jackups in 2016. What’s more, we estimate that slightly less than half of its jackup revenues will still be derived from standard rigs, which…will make up the units that are more at risk of obsolescence…Further, we note that after our revisions, Ensco screens expensive on a relative valuation basis. Specifically, despite our 2016 EBITDA estimate remaining 4% above Street expectations, Ensco is still trading at an 11% premium relative to peers despite its above average nearer-term floater risk and in light of the jackup risk. We acknowledge that free cash flow remains robust, even in our revised outlook, but note risk to this, especially as it relates to the need for additional capex just to sustain our current outlook.


Company's been profitable each year past ten. 6% dividend yield while holding (assuming it doesn't get cut). Company trades a 1x stated bv (assuming risk of obsolescence won't cause assets to be written off).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext