Ahhh. We have already seen that Shep is an obvious fraud. But as you point out, he knows he is fraud and persists in fraudulent behavior. He was supposed to show me making a claim that my race is superior to another. He submitted the following statement from me as his "proof":
"There is a clear and obvious distinction between the negros and regular Americans who are black. The negros whine and scream for handouts, claiming Bush has stolen their jobs and that he is racist and that he is like Hitler. They are still frozen in the 1950's -- still convinced that someone has to give them something."
So, we see here where I claimed some blacks are "negros" and some are just Americans who are black. I said the negros whine and the blacks are just Americans like everyone else. So, in short, we see it is my opinion that we have two groups of blacks: 1. "negros" (who apparently repulse me) and 2. Americans who are blacks (and who I embrace as fellow Americans like any other)
Is there a reasonable person anywhere who can find racism here? It is quite apparent that my beef is not with an entire group of people, but with only a certain subset of the group. It is also logically necessary that the basis of my rejection is not race, but behavior, since the "negros" are of the same race as my black American brothas (git down, J. Fraud!). Were the negros to change behavior, I would obviously accept them as I do my brothas. No racism at all. Even assuming I openly claimed that some blacks are innately superior to others (which I didn't), that is still quite obviously not racism since both black groups are of the same race. (duuuuuuh...)
Somehow, J. Fraud don't be able to be seein' dis mess...Being an exposed fraud must be a miserable existence.
J. Fraud axed you:Are "negroes" white?
As I have said in another post, "negros" certainly can be white or of any other race. If one is stuck in the 1950's on this issue, then I am going to think one is an ignorant negro whatever one's race. In my opinion, blacks can be free to be as they wish to be, and they ought not incur the ridicule of anyone simply because they are striving to actualize themselves here in nature. When Dipy (who I think is black despite his implied claims, but who may be white) ridicules Powell as a "House Slave" simply because Powell supports the President (as do Cheney and a host of other whites), then Dipy acts like an ignorant negro.
But what I think be cool is why I chose the word "negro."
You see, I like the word because it is quite innocuous, hilariously innocuous. Nevertheless somehow it has magically acquired an unsavory meaning. What that meaning is, no one really knows. But when it is used in a certain way, hair begins to rise. So it is very useful in cases where leftists throw around truly unsavory words like "House Slave" in order to ridicule into submission black Americans who have every right to live and be free in this country.
Using the word "negro" calls forth all sorts of demons in the leftist's mind. When you say the word, especially to a leftist who likes to use genuine insults like "House Slave," you can take it to the bank that that leftist will grow angry, grit his teeth and yell "RACIST!!" as if he is innocent and you've burned a cross in his front yard. It just will not occur to him that hurling insults like "House Slave" and "disgrace to his race" are truly more racist than using the simple word "negro." And leftist white negros will come running along too, “Awww. Dear. Yes. He said ‘negro’ simply because you said he was a ‘House Slave’ and a ‘disgrace to his race.’ Yes. I do agree- he is a racist! We’ll see if we can pass some laws against this. And, who knows? We maybe able to get you a little check. Now get back to your ghetto and poor schools. And don’t forget to vote!”
I used the word "negro" in response to “House Slave” and “Disgrace to his race.” That's one innocuous word against two openly racist assaults - and leftists are whining about the former and not the latter. I find their hypocrisy terribly intriguing. |
