SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (54738)3/20/2008 7:19:08 PM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh  Read Replies (2) of 541791
 
To my knowledge, no security is provided for family members beyond the immediate family of the president. I don't see any reason that should change, irregardless of threats. If such threats occur, it is a private family matter for them to deal with in terms of protection. Extended family members of Presidents have traveled the world and managed to do so safely. Why should it be different if they live elsewhere? I simply found an interest in extended family rather odd. Bush II has two rather miscreant brothers who are not spoken of nor seen (and made personal fortunes off their name, not a few dollars for giving an interview). And there was Billy Carter, the raskol bro of Jimmy.(who cashed in by selling Billy Beer).
I think the biggest potential threat to America from a family member might have been that ballet dancing son of Ronny's, tho. (sorry, couldn't resist that)

I consider Obama's extended family is irrelevant. As is McCain's. And Hillary's.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext