Experience isn't a monolithic concept... there are all kinds and grades of experience... some people have great depth of understanding, highly successful life skills and talents, and high intelligence, and that person would be my top choice over anyone who claims 30 years of "experience" but is also void of talent, skill, and intelligence to do the job, that 30 years of experience could be 30 years of incompetence and stupidity...
I've done a ton of hiring in my business over the years for very high level executive positions... successful life skills and personal creative talents count far more than simple "experience"... on a scale of 1 to 10 I would put talent at a high 10 and experience at a 1, especially if that experience is fatally flawed...
Just because someone was at a particular or related job for more than 30 years, such an individual may actually be hopelessly inappropriate for the job due to long standing very bad job habits and lack of any original thinking on the previous jobs... that kind of experience means nothing at all...
This is why "experience" as a criteria for hiring means absolutely nothing by itself, and any knowledgeable and skilled interviewer would know at least this much...
kasich has more than shown himself to be defectively immature, he lacks the energy, the stamina, and intellectual voltage to handle the requirements of the job he seeks... when pressured only minimally, he squeals and whines like a little boy in the school yard claiming that he's the only one who knows how to do everything yet no one likes him or would listen to him... I find him seriously lacking, he should leave the race and go home...
christie, while he seems like a nice enough fellow, also seriously lacks the depth at many levels required of the job...
GZ |
