SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (554664)4/16/2014 5:04:04 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) of 793916
 
As always, John Hinderaker cuts to the chase...

So it is possible that the federal government is driving Bundy off federal
lands to make way for mitigation activities that enable the solar energy
development to the north.

But I don’t think it is necessary to go
there.

Rather–this is the second and more important point–it is obvious
that some activities are favored by the Obama administration’s BLM, and others
are disfavored.

The favored developments include solar and wind
projects.

No surprise there: the developers of such projects are
invariably major Democratic Party donors.

Wind and solar energy
survive only by virtue of federal subsidies, so influencing people like Barack
Obama and Harry Reid is fundamental to the developers’ business
plans.

Ranchers, on the other hand, ask nothing from the federal
government other than the continuation of their historic rights.

It is
a safe bet that Cliven Bundy is not an Obama or Reid contributor
.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext