SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Graham Osborn who wrote (55677)7/13/2015 5:01:14 PM
From: IndependentValue  Read Replies (1) of 78673
 
Hi Graham

Thanks for your response - a couple of thoughts/questions:

Agree on the inflection point - I tend to look at last 3-5 years for stocks that pass my initial EV/FCF screen (less than 7x) - I will then extend to c. 10 years FCF record to ensure reasonable consistency in the track record - this generally indicates persistence of quality and/or competitive advantage in my view. This approach also mitigates the variability of FCF that you highlight

You mention that you dislike both income-dependent multiples and book dependent ones - so what type of multiples does that leave you with? (I assume income dependent includes P/S, P/E, P/FCF, EV/EBITDA etc as these are all types of income just at different levels descending the income or cash-flow statement) ?

Also, can you explain further how ROIC is harder to use in a mature bull market? Not sure I follow you on this point. Also is ROE not income dependent ?

Finally, agree on screening generally; I've stayed away from screening for quite a while, but returned to it just in the last few weeks, given lack of identifiable opportunities/value out there in my view based on news flow (seems like anything interesting from reading news flow is at a 20 PE / 15x EBITDA / 25x+ FCF !)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext