SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : New India

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (556)8/14/2013 7:10:18 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation

Recommended By
ChinuSFO

   of 608
 
India Falls Behind Rivals in “Great Game East”

Walter Russell Mead
The American Interest
August 14, 2013

The opening of Burma’s economy should have galvanized Indian policymakers and businessmen, but Delhi has already fallen behind behind its rivals in the race to take advantage of new business and diplomatic opportunities there. Not long after Burma began its reform process, India announced it would redouble efforts in its “ Look East” policy. The architects of the policy argued that too much of Delhi’s focus is on Pakistan, and that India’s eastern neighbors, especially Burma, offer more promising chances for cooperation and mutual enrichment. So what happened?

India “has largely failed to implement its ‘Look East’ policy in any meaningful, concrete way,” the Irrawaddy magazine reports. Proposed railroads have gone unbuilt, and highways between eastern India and Burma remain closed. Modernization projects have been slow to show progress. Weapons, drugs and insurgents still pass freely over the long border the two countries share. Even if these issues were resolved, Burma’s interest in Indian assets may be limited:
While Myanmar’s government has sought Indian expertise in certain areas such as software development, telecoms and services, it is less interested in what India may have to offer in key economic areas such as mining, heavy industries or infrastructure building. Nor does Myanmar’s army look to India as an alternative to China as a source of military hardware: Now that relations with the West are on the mend, the Tatmadaw [Burma's armed forces] can anticipate eventually having access to the world’s most advanced military technology. Development megaprojects are also beyond India’s means—for these, Myanmar is more likely to seek partners in Japan or Asean.

“India’s biggest weakness,” as the Economist wrote in a 2011 review of David Malone’s book on Indian foreign policy,
is in its own region….As the local hegemon it should be doing much more to foster economic ties and stability all over its back yard. Instead relations with all its neighbours, with the exception of a couple of minnows like Bhutan and the Maldives, are mostly sour, and regional trade is pitiful. Until India shows more charm—or strength—to those nearby, distant powers are unlikely to take its global pretensions very seriously.

In Burma, as in much of Southeast Asia, India is trying to catch up with China, which has been heavily involved in this region for years. Diplomatic ties between Japan and ASEAN, too, have grown considerably warmer in the past few years, and business is booming. As the world’s largest democracy and an emerging global power, India has an interest and the ability to also connect with its eastern neighbors, but so far those opportunities have unfortunately gone largely unrealized.

blogs.the-american-interest.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext