SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stop the War!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas M. who wrote (5572)3/30/2003 5:04:22 PM
From: Thomas M.   of 21614
 
15 Stories They've Already Bungled

Mitchell on the War Coverage So Far

By Greg Mitchell

NEW YORK -- Opinion

The war is only a week old and already the media has gotten at least
15 stories wrong or misreported a sliver of fact into a major event.
Television news programs, of course, have been the prime culprits.
Newspapers, while they have often gone along for the ride, have been
much more nuanced and careful. Newspaper coverage has not been
faultless, as photos and headlines often seem shock-and-awe-struck
but, compared with TV, newspapers seem more editorially -- and
mentally -- balanced. Some have actually displayed a degree of
skepticism of claims made by the military and the White House -- what
used to be known as "journalism."

On Monday, I received a call from a producer of a major network's
prime time news program. He said they wanted to interview me for a
piece on how the public's expectation of a quick victory somehow was
too high. "But," he hastened to add, "we don't want to focus on the
media." I asked him where he thought the public might have received
the information that falsely raised their hopes. In chat rooms,
perhaps? The problem, I suggested, is that most of the TV
commentators on the home front appear to be just as "embedded"
with the military as the far braver reporters now in the Iraqi desert.

Surely this is a bipartisan issue. While many on the antiwar side
complain about the media's alleged "pro-war bias," those who
support the war, and the Bush administration itself, have also been ill
served by overly-positive coverage that now has millions of Americans
reeling from diminished expectations.

Here, then, is a list of stories that have been widely misreported or
poorly reported so far:

1. Saddam may well have been killed in the first night's surprise attack
(March 20).

2. Even if he wasn't killed, Iraqi command and control was no doubt
"decapitated" (March 22).

3. Umm Qasr has been taken (March 22).

4. Most Iraqis soldiers will not fight for Saddam and instead are
surrendering in droves (March 22).

5. Iraqi citizens are greeting Americans as liberators (March 22).

6. An entire division of 8,000 Iraqi soldiers surrendered en masse
near Basra (March 23).

7. Several Scud missiles, banned weapons, have been launched
against U.S. forces in Kuwait (March 23).

8. Saddam's Fedayeen militia are few in number and do not pose a
serious threat (March 23).

9. Basra has been taken (March 23).

10. Umm Qasr has been taken (March 23).

11. A captured chemical plant likely produced chemical weapons
(March 23).

12. Nassiriya has been taken (March 23).

13. Umm Qasr has been taken (March 24).

14. The Iraqi government faces a "major rebellion" of anti-Saddam
citizens in Basra (March 24).

15. A convoy of 1,000 Iraqi vehicles and Republican Guards are
speeding south from Baghdad to engage U.S. troops (March 25).

Source: Editor & Publisher Online

mediainfo.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext