Amazing how, when its own interests are at stake, the 
    media manages to be very forceful in reporting relevant 
    facts. But now, when those facts are even more relevant 
    because Mrs. Wilson and congressional Democrats are 
    bloviating about ruined intelligence networks and 
    threatened lives, the media won't mention them. How can it
    be possible that a leak in 2002 "jeopardized and even 
    destroyed entire networks of foreign agents" associated 
    with Mrs. Wilson's covert assignment when, by the media's 
    own account to a federal court, those networks had to have
    been blown for years?