SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Amati investors
AMTX 1.490-0.7%Dec 10 3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tera Bit who wrote (5617)11/14/1996 7:12:00 PM
From: pat mudge   of 31386
 
<<<They specifically point to the ORCTF prospectus and Darby & Darby, ORCTF' intellectual property counsel, stating that Orckit's product does not infringe.>>>

Daniel --

Thanks for the thorough reply. It's been awhile since I read the ORCTF prospectus, but it was either there or in conversation with Ron Carlini that I got the impression the infringement judgment was based on conversation between ORCTF and their attorneys. In other words, they were given a verbal description of the patents in question and based their decision on that.

I'd like to think this isn't still the case, though it would certainly give those making the judgement a backdoor.

Regards,

Pat
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News