Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (56642)	7/16/1999 12:50:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) of 67261

Neocon, I am not sure what your point is here and I hate to go down this abortion chasm again. However, I have posted articles that clearly show that California has not voted for any pro-life candidate... not even a senator since Ronald Reagan. And when candidates that are ahead in the polls make a public stance on the issue (that is pro-life), as Matt Fong did last year, they turn their substantial lead into a substantial loss. There isn't really any way to deny this. Message 10400112 I am only speaking about one state, California. If you want to talk about your area fine, I certainly won't call you on it. But you do seem to present yourself as someone "in the know" in politics, and yet you categorically deny these obvious facts from time to time. I'm sure you will remember the discussion you and I had where you tried to insinuate that the Republicans did not lose miserably in California during the last election. You claimed that you did some research and could not see any evidence of this horrendous loss.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next