SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Oeconomicus who wrote (57725)4/14/2007 5:26:18 PM
From: Jim S   of 90947
 
Oecon, I agree with Long'un here.

I don't object to seat belts or smoking, but I heartedly object to the gub'mint sticking its nose in on what individuals do. I also don't think there should be any laws against skydiving, bungee jumping, or rock climbing.

While you may not like the "slippery slope" characterization, it's a very real problem. Perhaps you'd prefer the "camel's nose under the tent" analogy? <G>

As a case in point, consider the recently proposed law in CA that would send parents to jail for spanking their kids. The state of Arizona had to specifically pass a law several years ago that in fact PERMITTED parents to spank their kids, as a result of various lawsuits.

Some cities have passed ordinances telling adults that they couldn't even smoke in their homes or cars.

I assume that you and I are of similar ages. If so, we both grew up in an age where kids could ride in the back of pickups, take naps on the "rear shelf" of our parent's cars, and mothers could ride with infants in their laps, even in airplanes. While I'll concede that perhaps the government has an interest in regulating seat belts and motorcycle helmets for kids under the age of 18, they have no business or interest in such regulation of adults.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext