SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bentway who wrote (579986)8/8/2010 4:01:16 PM
From: tejek   of 1577147
 
I hadn't realized how far Fox and O'Reilly were taking the race issue. They are making it very clear that they are standing up only for the white race....and only that portion of the white race that is affluent.

Let the race wars begin..........

MADDOW 2, O'REILLY 0....

A couple of weeks ago, there was an interesting dustup between Fox News' Bill O'Reilly and MSNBC's Rachel Maddow. While these kinds of disputes can often become petty and tiresome, the area of disagreement in this case is actually pretty interesting, and so I'm glad it's continuing.

To briefly recap for those just joining us, as the Shirley Sherrod matter was unfolding, Rachel noted O'Reilly's misguided role in pushing nonsense, and tied it to Fox News' role in pushing racial divisions. O'Reilly responded by boasting about his ratings, leading Rachel to note that the truth matters more than the size of one's audience.

O'Reilly followed up in his syndicated column, calling Rachel a "loon," and calling the notion that Fox News is trying to scare white voters "preposterous." He labeled Rachel's comments "paranoid dishonest rants," lacking even "a shred of evidence." O'Reilly added that Fox News has great ratings.

This week, Rachel responded that the argument is so "stupid," it "doesn't even get dressed up in Latin phrasing." She added that Fox News "consistently runs stories it says are news, but that nobody else really covers. Stories that are ginned up, exaggerated, caricatured, in some cases flat-out made-up scare stories designed to make white people feel afraid of black people. Designed to make it seem like black people -- or in some cases immigrants -- are threatening white people and taking what is rightfully theirs. You may not like that diagnosis of what Fox has been up to, but to say there's no evidence -- not 'a shred of evidence,' as he said -- that's bullpucky."

[watch video]

After highlighting a wide variety of examples to bolster her case, Rachel concluded, "[R]emember, Mr. O'Reilly says there is not a shred of evidence that Fox News hypes stories about scary black people taking white people's stuff.

"I am not interested in playing cable news insult ping-pong with Mr. O'Reilly, but as much as he keeps insisting that I'm no one worth arguing with, that I'm an 'uber-leftist' -- he called me that in his column -- and a loon twice now, and a slightly larger percentage of 1% of the population watches his show than the proportion of 1% of the population that watches my show, for all he complains about how unimportant I am, my criticism that Fox News scares white people on purpose to politically benefit conservatives -- damn the consequences for the country -- that criticism appears to have struck a nerve over at Fox. It appears to have gotten under Mr. O'Reilly's skin.

"Good."

washingtonmonthly.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext