Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 178.29

-1.6%

Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scott Zion who wrote (5801)	12/29/2000 10:17:34 PM
From: Sully-	of 196955

>>"All of the manufacturers I have talked to that are licensing the CDMA are telling us that it is absolutely false that they are paying royalties to Qualcomm for UMTS," Woo said.<< I agree. None of them are currently paying royalties to QCOM. QCOM has announced WCDMA contracts with almost every major player. They will pay royalties when legally required to do so..... per their signed contract with QCOM.... However..... Worded as Mr. Woo is quoted, it sounds like a careful spin to cast doubt on QCOM's essential IPR position in regards to WCDMA. It makes for a nice angle to play in the FUD arena. AT&T is like the GSM cabal. They want to give the perception that they have the best overall system for 3G & they are in control of the future of 3G. Obfuscating the IPR issue raised doubts about QCOM's IPR & their role in the dominate 3G system. BWDIK? Hopefully QCOM's IR will comment on the whole article soon. Ö¿Ö

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next