| That's convenient. You seem to be a kind of hit and run arguer, to me, imo. Make statements, characterizations, cast aspersions, stir up trouble, and then "not bother with" replying to any objections or requests for explanation. Of course I could be wrong, it only seems to me that you seem like a hit and run discussant, in some other culture that may be considered the responsible way to argue, and I'm not saying that answering questions about one's assertions or backing up one's arguments is right, I'm just saying what I prefer, but someone else could think hit and run arguing was better, but that's just not me, but I'm not saying it's worse or better, I'm just saying it's not the way I do things or what I personally respect, but that's just my opinion, of course. |