SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (587911)9/28/2010 5:37:38 PM
From: TimF1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 1576619
 
With deficits and debt as high as they are now, a reasonable (if questionable) argument can be made that a tax increase would be economically beneficial if all else is to remain exactly equal.

But the "everything else remains the same" policy is foolish, since its the spending that's actually causing the debt and thus the harm. The taxes directly cause additional harm, but they may alleviate some of the harm caused by the debt. The way to avoid both types of harms is just to control spending.

Borrowing crowds out private investment. Taxes on investment (including personal taxes on non-corporate business owners), also crowd out investment. The point to take away from this than is government spending crowds out private investment, and is harmful to the economy.

And note that the average for the range of alleged harm for "full extension permanent" is lower than the alleged harm from "partial extension permanent". The CBO is thus saying that the raising taxes on just "the rich" would be more harmful than raising taxes on everyone. Hardly an idea I think you want to promote.

Also the complaints about the debt ring hollow when presented by someone who's supported spending increase after spending increase like you.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext