SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 155.82-1.3%Jan 23 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: peterk who wrote (59079)1/25/2007 6:08:36 PM
From: Q8tfreebe  Read Replies (1) of 197353
 
I think the reason you don't see any mention of a possible injunction against Nokia is because there is Zero risk Nokia will actually be effected by an injuction. In other words, given the existance of the option, Nokia has complete control over whether an injuction will become effective and cause them any damage. If the threat of an injunction looks real and imminent, Nokia simply exercies the option and avoids the injunction altogether. Again, that is why the judges recent decision (i.e. requesting that Nokia first admit that it will infringe on QCOM patents before considering whether to delay any injunction request) was so important.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News