SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CheckFree Holdings Corp. (CKFR), the next Dell, Intel?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gregg Soster who wrote (5964)6/3/1999 10:54:00 AM
From: jjbucci   of 20297
 
Gregg,
<<Using our patented ATM network-based architecture

I have heard that this patent is not defensible, too broad, general ect.. plus nobody I
have talked to wants saddled with more ATM transaction fees. Probably why their
still as small as they are after so many years.>>

The job of a patent attorney is to seek the broadest possible claims in light of any prior art found during the searches.

Now, if you are saying the patent is indefensible because of prior art, that's another story entirely.

But, Too broad and general have nothing to do with whether it's defensible.

I don't know anything about the patent in question, but am responding on a general basis only.

jjbucci
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News