Author: teevee -- Date:1999-02-23 16:38:11
phew, Talk about loading a fellow up with question after question after question....well...I will try, 1. diatreme facies form when kimberlite magma and gases interact with groundwater near surface. The result of the interaction of expanding gases, magma and groundwater is an explosive eruption piercing the bedrock to surface. This expansion process which gives rise the the carrot shape of kimberlite diatremes is thought to occur when lithostatic pressure falls below the pressures of the magma, gases and groundwaters converted to steam upon contact with the magma. 2. By "emplacement process", i mean that the magma is injected along a fault or fracture. 3. By "hypabyssal" I mean near surface but sub-volcanic or in the case of kimberlite, sub diatreme; "diatreme" as in carrot shaped volcanic vent; "epiclastic" as in water worked layered, reworked pyroclatic material, usually formed in "crater lake"; "pyroclatic" as in airfall crater rim, airfall fragmental rocks. 4. First, there are less volitiles (CO2) in Type II kimberlites...second, much of the breakage is thought to occur during the explosive "diatreme" or volcanic venting stage. Harzburgite or eclogite nodule? possible but there have been no reports of indicator mineral chemistry indicating the presence of eclogites......perhaps someone who has seen some of the core displayed at the Roundup could comment regarding xenoliths? In general, the transport process of diamond xenoliths involves more or less dilution and degradation of the diamond... 5. Breccia intersections appear to be the exception and not the rule at Snap Lake. I suspect these "breccias" are formed where areas of hangingwall or footwall rock was stoped during injection of the dyke. The fragments entrained in the dyke form and give the appearance of breccia....note that grades are lower in the breccias as well...due to dilution from the addition of wallrock. The rock found within the carot shaped portion of a volcanic vent is fragmental and is therefore also a breccia, however, not all breccias are diatremes as you have asked or do they necessarily imply as vent or diatreme. 6. Other posters have alluded to multiple emplacement and I cannot speak for them, however, what I mean by multiple emplacement is that there could be seperate, distinct "feeders" of slightly diferent ages. Each "feeder" could have injected its own ring dyke or sill or cone sheet (whatever you wish to call it)....if this is the case, the petrology and diamond content for each separate ring dyke of a diferent age and parentage should be distinct...Alternately, one "feeder" may have injected more than one ring dyke (or sill), with each having similar petrology and diamond content. I am sure you have noted mutiple intercepts in some drill holes. As far as the dyke under the NW peninsula and the north shore is concerned, I am of the opinion that it was injected during a single event. I suspect you may be alluding to a post by George Tromp and his musing on the NW peninsula in responce to one of your postings copied to SI? I believe he is confusing "diatreme breccias" with other kinds of breccias, such as the possible type or kind I mentioned in #5. 7. rapid cooling with respect to Snap Lake is in regards to the fact that the "dunite" dyke is not serpentinized.....there are thin chill margins which suggest that the rock may break cleanly during mining....it also has implications for milling and diamond recovery....there will be far less clay than one would expect from a serpentinized diatreme like at Ekati....you may be aware that clay is a "headache" in the diamond recovery process and is also a problem at Ekati......cooling rates and the presence of water could effect serpentinization or the lack thereof in various facies. 8. Yes, there is hypabyssal type I kimberlite, usually associated with type I kimberlite pipes. They are poorly understood and have never been exploited for diamond. There are type II kimberlite diatremes. An example is the Finsch mine operated by De Beers. Type II pyroclatic kimberlite? don't know, I'm not aware of any published descriptions.
Perhaps I coud impose upon you to illuminate some of the more esoteric aspects of statistical evaluation of various deposits sometime? I'm sure we would all be appreciative. regards, teevee |