SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: WogofWallStreet who wrote (59992)10/23/2017 11:56:56 PM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (1) of 78740
 
However what concerns me, and what I'd like some help on, is that just because a companies stock is trading below the NCAVPS should it be considered an investment opportunity? Surely there needs to be more than that, more fundamental analysis. Should you also look for strong financial strength, positive cash flow, no deficit in earnings too?


I say no further additional financial analysis required. I check for other warts though (e.g. self-serving managments) And I want to buy and hold a package of these 2/3 NCAVPS stocks, not just one or two.
In my experience past 15 years, this has worked out moderately poorly. lol. Well, for one thing, I'm not going to commit anything other than a very small portion of my capital to the cigar-butts. Which are hard to find. And the ones I do find often are on such lists for years, if not decades (perhaps they are value traps).
So ultimately, my overall profit with these is insignificantly small.

Other, best investors on this thread (e.g. Jim Clarke, investing pro who doesn't post here anymore) insist on only considering profitable companies. What does Ben Graham say? Well, he doesn't. However, EVERY NCAV example in his book is of a profitable company. Try to find several of these, these days. Hah.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext